Shortly after its implementation, one poll commissioned by the Illinois Manufacturers’ Association found nearly 87 percent of Cook County residents disapproved of the tax, and in the same poll 80 percent said they believed the tax was being done strictly for money and not for public health. Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle later admitted that the county’s sweetened beverage tax was always about increasing revenue.
“We chose as a revenue generator a sweetened beverage tax, which had been enacted around the country, both for the revenue and because of the health benefits,” she said. “But first and foremost, because of the revenue.”
Taxpayer anger has extended beyond the soda tax debate. Constituents are expressing their displeasure with politicians who enacted and supported the tax by reportedly refusing to sign circulating petitions to simply place incumbents on the ballot in 2018, according to Crain’s Chicago Business.
The fall of the sweetened beverage tax serves as a prime example of political activism at the grassroots level. Elected officials felt the anger of taxpayers. And Cook County commissioners were forced to flip their votes in an attempt to avoid electoral defeat.
The fight does not end here, however. As state and local governments in Illinois face continuing budget crises, elected officials will try to hit up tapped-out taxpayers rather than tackle needed reforms.
In fact, Cook County is one particularly good example of this.
More than 2,200 Cook County workers receive annual pay over $100,000. For career county workers – those who’ll work for 30-plus years – that means pension benefits worth millions of dollars over the course of their retirements.
Career Cook County workers who retired after 2013 with 30-plus years of service receive an average starting pension of $58,000 a year, meaning they’ll receive about $2 million in total benefits over the course of their retirement.
But Cook County commissioners sought new revenues instead of spending reforms.
Thankfully, taxpayers fought back to stop their efforts. And now they should fight for the change needed to truly fix spending problems within their local governments.
Chicago-area politicians should look to enact meaningful reforms such as introducing a 401(k)-style alternative to failing pension funds, addressing local spending and eliminating tax increment financing districts.
Taxpayers should keep up the pressure on elected officials to adopt these reforms. Otherwise, residents will continue to live under the constant threat of increased taxes and fees. |
|
