#twill #tcot #sbalich #maga #leadright #FMUSA #abortion #life
Tony Perkins / @tperkins / February 12, 2020
“Negligent homicide isn’t abortion. Taking the life of a newborn baby that could grow up in a loving family isn’t abortion,” Tony Perkins writes. (Photo: Kaori Ando/Getty Images)
COMMENTARY BY
Tony Perkins is president of the Family Research Council.
“Can you look me in the eye and tell me that I shouldn’t be alive?” That was the question 14 abortion survivors never got to ask America. Fox Sports, the host of this year’s Super Bowl, refused to air their ad.
Maybe it was afraid of creating controversy. Or maybe, it was worried about putting a real face on this thing called “choice.” Either way, it’s a question our country needs to answer. And Tuesday morning, Senate Republicans looked at their colleagues and did.
When 44 leaders of this country walked to the Senate floor last February and voted to make newborn-killing legal, our country crossed into territory most of us considered unthinkable.
“Republicans need to stop wasting time on political games and legislation aimed at rolling back women’s constitutionally protected rights,” Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., fumed.
In these trying times, we must turn to the greatest document in the history of the world to promise freedom and opportunity to its citizens for guidance. Find out more now >>
But negligent homicide isn’t abortion. Taking the life of a newborn baby that could grow up in a loving family isn’t abortion.
“We’ve heard speech after speech after speech that have nothing to do with what’s actually in this bill,” Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., insisted. “We’re talking about babies that have already been born … We’re not talking about Roe v. Wade.”
In the year since Democrats marched to the floor and staked out ground no civilized country can defend, Americans have finally come to understand the horrors of what they stand for. And with the exception of the 2020 candidates, they’re desperate for infanticide to end.
Sasse knows Republicans can’t do it alone—so yesterday morning, he and the rest of the Senate Judiciary Committee did their best to explain exactly what’s at stake.
In a hearing called “The Infant Patient: Ensuring Appropriate Medical Care for Children Born Alive,” Sasse made it clear, “ … I’m not here to get my pro-abortion rights colleagues to join me at next year’s March for Life. That’s not what this hearing is about.”
This hearing is not about overturning Roe v. Wade. In fact, this hearing is not actually about limiting access to abortion at all. This hearing isn’t a debate about third-trimester, or second-trimester, or first-trimester abortion. This hearing is about making sure that every newborn baby has a fighting chance—whether she’s born in a labor and delivery ward or whether she’s born in an abortion clinic.
For once, he urged, can we not “immediately retreat into the fortified and familiar trenches our two parties have occupied for most of the past 47 years?”
The Family Research Council’s Patrina Mosley, director of life, culture, and women’s advocacy, had the opportunity to testify and debunk the lie that this is somehow a phony crisis.
There are hundreds of official reports and eyewitness accounts of newborns being born alive and later destroyed. And yet, “There have been no cases involving prosecutions under the [2002] Born-Alive Infants Protection Act that we know of. Why? Because there is currently no federal criminal statute specifically prohibiting taking the lives of born-alive infants.”
If babies do survive, Mosley said, it’s because of the compassion of others. But we cannot, she insisted, “rely on the extraordinary for these infants to have a chance at life. Instead, we should expect that ordinary care be given to anyone considered a full person under the law.”
As we speak, 35 states (and the federal government) don’t have the adequate protections for babies who live through a botched abortion. To people like Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, that’s astounding. “I’m aware of no other circumstance in the law where we would willfully disregard the humanity of a human being.”
And the idea, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said, “that it would somehow be debatable, what to do with that child … is a remarkable statement of just how extreme and radical the pro-abortion side of this debate has gotten.”
Melissa Ohden wakes up every single day trying to cope with the fact that there are people in this country who think the nurse who found her 42 years ago, burning in a bucket of saline, should have just walked away.
To the U.S. Senate, House, Democratic candidates, and media, she wants to know: “Can you really look me in the eye and tell me that I didn’t deserve to live?”
To read Mosley’s testimony, click here. Also, check out the powerful ad featuring Ohden and survivors from all around the world.
Originally published in Tony Perkins’ Washington Update, which is written with the aid of Family Research Council senior writers.
