Miss Constitution Analyzes. . . Day 29 of the Presidential Election Crisis
Attorney General Barr. . . State Hearings. . . Computer Systems
Miss Constitution has asked that you pay special attention to the next 45 days. You will not be able to flip on the television and find news you can rely upon. There are very few sources of accurate information and there is little journalism left. This moment in time is, in Miss Constitution’s opinion, the most critical since the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the wholesale secession of the South.
So, where are we?
- Attorney General William Barr announced he has not seen fraud sufficient to affect the recent Presidential election
- Legislative hearings have been held in Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Michigan regarding ballot fraud with witness testimony under oath
- Today is the deadline for legal Answers to the lawsuits filed by Attorney Sidney Powell in Michigan and Georgia
By reputation, Attorney General Barr is an honorable person and while he has been in positions of public trust for some time, is not a part of the “swamp.” Miss Constitution thinks that the Attorney General’s reputation for integrity and discretion can be respected. It must be remembered that the Attorney General of the United States represents the American people, and while he is appointed by the President, he has a special role to play in the perception of fairness in federal investigations and prosecutions. In this situation the Attorney General is going to wait for more compelling evidence to emerge and he is not going to vigorously investigate anything to do with this election for fear of being seen as too partisan.
You will recall that a Presidential election is really a State election with a Presidential component. Hearings have been held and more hearings will be held regarding weaknesses in the system in several States that are essentially inviting or promoting ballot fraud. These hearings and the evidence presented at these hearings may be used in these States to tighten up State election law. What you should notice, if you can find the hearings broadcast, is the sincerity of those testifying. These are regular people. These are not bureaucrats with “swamp-speak”, these are ordinary Americans who are just appalled at what they were asked to do or were prevented from doing. Senator Rand Paul said that if people are given a chance to cheat, they will cheat. Miss Constitution still believes that most Americans are honest people. Please note that these hearings are NOT evidentiary hearings in a Court of Law. So far, no Court has agreed to hear evidence of Presidential election fraud. Without a Court evidentiary hearing it is impossible to prove or fail to prove election fraud that would compel all Americans to accept the election results.
What needs to be shown to involve the Department of Justice?
What needs to be shown is evidently more than violations of Equal Protection of the Law or lack of Due Process or anecdotal evidence of ballot stuffing, or back-dating, or overvoting, or statistical anomalies, or even any of the myriad of ways that dead people, or non-registered people, or multiple-voting people, or incapacitated people, voted who should not have. What needs to be shown is a premeditated fraud involving hundreds of thousands of votes controlled by persons with a desire for a particular outcome and working with computer systems that can be wiped clean or not traced or somehow destroyed that will get the attention of an appropriate Judge. If any foreign ownership or partisan ownership or connection to any campaign team or foreign power or open internet connection or offshore tabulation is involved, the whole Presidential election is fouled.
Right now, we have no President-elect and there is no such thing as an Office of President-elect regardless of what is transmitted to the public by the media. Stay tuned.
