Want to see it in action? Take a trip to Cuba or Venezuela. But if you do, take some toilet paper and food with you. Both are hard to come by.
Here’s socialism explained in less than two minutes.
Report: Classified Info From Hillary’s Email Found On Romanian Server
Andy Cross/The Denver Post via Getty ImagesAndy Cross/The Denver Post via Getty Images
BY: AARON BANDLER OCTOBER 19, 2016
There is now more evidence that Hillary Clinton’s server was hacked.
The Washington Examiner reports that the FBI’s notes on their investigation on Clinton’s server reveal that an unidentified company found a file that is believed to be from Clinton’s emails – and partly written by Russia – on a Romanian server that had “the names of known or suspected jihadists in Libya” on it.
The file was found as result of Judicial Watch’s efforts to find evidence that Clinton’s email server was hacked.
The Examiner’s report continues:
A Romanian hacker breached [Sidney] Blumenthal’s inbox in 2013 and exposed Clinton’s private email address for the first time, forcing her to change her username. Clinton’s allies have argued that hack did not compromise any of Clinton’s files.
However, the potentially classified file “did not come from Blumenthal’s server,” the witness said. Upon discovering the list of names, the individual who had been hired to conduct the online investigation “became concerned he had found a classified document and stopped the project.”
Throughout the campaign, Hillary Clinton has constantly maintained that “there is no evidence my system was hacked.” But as the Daily Wire has reported, the FBI has concluded that Clinton’s server was indeed hacked and the hacker “logged into the compromised email, read messages, and browsed attachments using a service called Tor.” The information that was likely compromised included “conducting missile-armed drone strikes against terrorists.”
Based on the FBI notes, it would appear that the file with names of Islamic terrorists winding up on a Romanian server is another example of Clinton’s email server being hacked.
If Clinton were to be confronted on this, she would likely just say she can’t recall. She has a penchant for doing that.
Andy Cross/The Denver Post via Getty ImagesAndy Cross/The Denver Post via Getty Images
BY: AARON BANDLER OCTOBER 19, 2016
21286
19 Comments
3207
There is now more evidence that Hillary Clinton’s server was hacked.
The Washington Examiner reports that the FBI’s notes on their investigation on Clinton’s server reveal that an unidentified company found a file that is believed to be from Clinton’s emails – and partly written by Russia – on a Romanian server that had “the names of known or suspected jihadists in Libya” on it.
The file was found as result of Judicial Watch’s efforts to find evidence that Clinton’s email server was hacked.
The Examiner’s report continues:
A Romanian hacker breached [Sidney] Blumenthal’s inbox in 2013 and exposed Clinton’s private email address for the first time, forcing her to change her username. Clinton’s allies have argued that hack did not compromise any of Clinton’s files.
However, the potentially classified file “did not come from Blumenthal’s server,” the witness said. Upon discovering the list of names, the individual who had been hired to conduct the online investigation “became concerned he had found a classified document and stopped the project.”
Throughout the campaign, Hillary Clinton has constantly maintained that “there is no evidence my system was hacked.” But as the Daily Wire has reported, the FBI has concluded that Clinton’s server was indeed hacked and the hacker “logged into the compromised email, read messages, and browsed attachments using a service called Tor.” The information that was likely compromised included “conducting missile-armed drone strikes against terrorists.”
Based on the FBI notes, it would appear that the file with names of Islamic terrorists winding up on a Romanian server is another example of Clinton’s email server being hacked.
If Clinton were to be confronted on this, she would likely just say she can’t recall. She has a penchant for doing that.
The control of the Democratic party machinery deliberately to unfairly ensure Clinton’s victory over Bernie Sanders is a matter of great public interest. The attempt by the establishment from Obama down to divert attention from this by a completely spurious claim against Russia, repeated without investigation by a servile media, is a disgrace.
The over-close relationship between the probable future President and Wall Street is also very important. WikiLeaks has done a great public service by making this plain.
The attempts by the mainstream media to portray WikiLeaks as supporters of Trump and Putin because they publish some of Clinton’s darker secrets is completely illogical and untrue in fact. The idea we must pretend Clinton is a saint is emetic.
But the key point is that WikiLeaks is a publisher. It is a vehicle for publishing leaks, and is much more of a vehicle for whistleblowers than for hackers. It does not originate the material. I have often seen comments such as “Why has WikiLeaks not published material on Israel/Putin/Trump?” The answer is that they have not been given any. They publish good, verifiable material that they are given by whistleblowers. They are not protecting Israel, Putin, or Trump. Nobody has given them viable material.
And that should be the main takeaway here.
Even if the Russians hacked Clinton’s emails in an effort to sway public opinion in the U.S., is that really such a bad thing for the average American?After all, all we’ve learned from the hack is that the person almost every media outlet says is the most qualified for president has succeed only because of media manipulation, selling of access and outright propaganda and psyop-level trickery.
The Clinton political machine has spent three decades building complex and entangling relationships with the people running all of America’s major media outlets to the point where Americans get nothing but “dear leader” style coverage of the Democratic presidential candidate. So Clinton is basically claiming that a totalitarian government is foiling her attempt to mimic the type of sham politics present places like… Russia?
Hillary Clinton’s Blackberry Blues Place National Security at Risk?
There is no longer any question that Hillary Clinton’s email scheme jeopardized our national security. Look no further than what we revealed this week.
We released new documents containing email correspondence between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Gen. David Petraeus, in which she had what she termed “blackberry blues” over her inability to use her BlackBerry inside her secure office. The FBI recovered these new emails from those not turned over by Hillary Clinton.
These emails are government documents and not personal emails, as Clinton claims in defending her decision to not turn over 30,000 emails sent or received by her as secretary of state. The emails also show she knew about the security issues of her BlackBerry use (and yet denied recalling anything about it or refused to answer our questions).
In the newly obtained email exchanges, Clinton also told Petraeus, “If there is ever anything you need or want me to know, pls use this personal email address” –hr15@att.blackberry.net – when corresponding with her. Petraeus, at the time of the email from Clinton, was the Commander of the United States Central Command, overseeing U.S. military efforts in critical areas, stretching from Northeast Africa across the Middle East to Central and South Asia, and including Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Egypt.
The new documents were among the nearly 15,000 Clinton emails discovered by the FBI, and obtained in response to a court order in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit for State Department records about Clinton’s separate email system (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00689)).
On January 28, 2008, only one week after becoming secretary of state, Clinton sent an email to Petraeus from her non-state.gov email account apologizing for her “tardy” response to his earlier email and blaming it on what she termed “blackberry blues”:
From: H [mailto:hdr22@clintonmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 9:33 PM
To: Petraeus, David H. GEN USA
Subject: Re: Follow up
David – Sorry to be so tardy in responding. I’ve had blackberry blues. I can’t use mine all day long since my whole office is a SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility]. I don’t yet have a computer and I had to change my address and lost some of my traffic.
(The State Department represented to a federal court that Hillary Clinton did not have a State Department computer.)
Shortly before taking office, Clinton emailed Petraeus asking that he use only her personal email account when contacting her. At the time, Petraeus was the Commander of the United States Central Command:
From: hr15@att.blackberry.net
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 3:57 PM
To: Petraeus, David H. GEN USA
Subject: Follow up
Dear Dave,
Thanks for giving me so much of your time the last two nights. I appreciated our conversations and enjoyed the chance to see you and Richard becoming acquainted. I’m looking forward to working w you both. If there is ever anything you need or want me to know, pls use this personal email address. All the best, Hillary.
Also included in the new emails is a response from Colin Powell to a January 23, 2009, message from Clinton detailing Powell’s warning to keep her BlackBerry use secret to circumvent federal records laws:
However there is real danger. If it is public that you have a BlackBerry and … you are using it, government or not to do business, it may become an official record and subject to the law….Be very careful. I got around it all by not saying much …
(The Powell email had previously been released.)
Our lawyers specifically asked about Clinton’s BlackBerry use as part of the twenty-five questions submitted on August 30 to Clinton as ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (see especially her answers to questions 14, 15, and 16).
In December 2015, thanks to a federal court order, we released documents containing more than 50 State Department internal emails from 2009 and 2011 warning of serious security concerns involving the use by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her staff of “highly vulnerable” BlackBerrys in the executive offices of the Foggy Bottom headquarters.
The discussion included a March 2, 2009, internal memorandum from Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Eric Boswell in which he advised Clinton and her Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills of “the vulnerabilities and risks associated with the use of BlackBerrys in Mahogany Row [seventh floor executive offices] considerably outweigh their convenience.” Testimony by Cheryl Mills in separate Judicial Watch litigation suggests Clinton used her BlackBerry in her office’s Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), despite security rules prohibiting the use of such devices in secure areas.
These new emails show the truth that the separate email system was never a matter of “convenience” for Mrs. Clinton. She wanted to hide her emails from the American people.
And her request to Petraeus while he was the Commander of the United States Central Command to communicate with her solely at her unsecure email address shows Hillary Clinton’s willful negligence in handling national defense information.
It’s now clear why she deleted or withheld so many and why Mrs. Clinton didn’t recall or declined to answer our questions about her email security.
New Emails Raise Questions about Hillary Clinton’s Sworn Testimony
Many Americans may be despairing as news comes out week after week of the FBI and Justice Department’s corrupted investigation of the Clinton email matter. But you can rest assured that your JW is on the case. Indeed, the latest from our own independent investigation might warrant the attention of honest law enforcement.
In her sworn responses to the questions in our written deposition, Hillary Clinton said she “did not recall” communicating with her IT specialist about her clintonemail.com account. Inconveniently for her, we now have emails making that excuse look rather flimsy.
We just released another batch of State Department documents uncovered by the FBI. The emails included reveal direct communications between Clinton and her top IT specialist, Bryan Pagliano, about clintonemail.com management problems.
Clinton claimed under oath that she “does not recall having communications” with Pagliano relating to the email system. Clinton’s emails to Pagliano, who installed and maintained the clintonemail.com computer system in the Clinton’s New York home, relate to email management problems with Clinton’s BlackBerry.
The FBI recovered these emails from those not turned over by Hillary Clinton. These new emails are government documents and not personal emails as Hillary Clinton claimed in defending her decision to not turn over 30,000 emails sent or received by her as Secretary of State.
The new documents were among the nearly 15,000 Clinton emails discovered by the FBI and obtained in response to an April 8, 2016, federal court order directing the Department of State to begin producing materials for Judicial Watch in response to a September 3, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-01441)). The lawsuit was filed after State failed to comply with an August 5, 2015 FOIA request seeking information about Bryan Pagliano’s involvement with Clinton’s email system.
Several “Test” messages were sent between Pagliano, Clinton, and her then-Deputy Chief of Staff Jon Davidson on September 2, 2011. And on March 2012 Clinton writes to Pagliano, “Once again, I’m having BB [BlackBerry] trouble”:
From: H
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:45 AM
To: Justin Cooper, Bryan Pagliano [Cooper was a senior advisor to Bill Clinton]
Cc: Oscar Floras [manager of Clinton’s New York home]
Subject: Help!
Once again, I’m having BB trouble. I am not receiving emails although people are getting ones I send but I get their replies on my IP. I’ve taken out the battery and done what I know to do but with no luck yet any ideas?
***
From: H
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:54 AM
To: Justin Cooper
Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores
Subject: Re: Help!
Thanks, Justin. How does that happen. do I need to do anything?
***
From: Bryan Pagliano
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 10:32 AM
To: H
Cc: Justin Cooper, Oscar Flores
Subject: Re: Help!
Let me take a look at the server to see if it offers any insight. iPhone is not much different from iPad, however in both cases the security landscape is different from the blackberry.
-Bryan
***
From: H hdr22@clintonemail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 11:44 AM
To: Justin Cooper
Cc: Bryan M. Pagliano, Oscar Flores
Subject: Re:
Thanks again. I’m back in business.
On October 13, 2016, we released Clinton’s responses given under oath to 25 questions we posed as ordered by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in separate litigation. The final question reads:
Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.
Clinton’s response:
Secretary Clinton objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that it requests information that is outside the scope of permitted discovery for the reasons set forth in General Objection No. 5. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 on the ground that the word “management” is vague. Secretary Clinton further objects to Interrogatory No. 25 insofar as it requests information related to alternate or replacement servers used after Secretary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing objections, Secretary Clinton states that she does not recall having communications with Bryan Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any e-mails in her clintonemail.com email account. [Emphasis added]
Clinton also claimed she “does not recall” 20 times in her responses given under oath.
In addition, Judicial Watch deposed Bryan Pagliano in June. He invoked his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself more than 125 times, including:
These newly exposed emails leave little doubt that Hillary Clinton was less than forthright and misled the public when she wrote, under oath, that she ‘does not recall’ communicating with Bryan Pagliano about her email scheme. Again, no wonder Clinton and her agents deleted these emails time and time again. And remember: these smoking gun emails would never have seen the light of day but for Judicial Watch’s federal lawsuits.
Lessons for Trump from the Clinton Scandals
Hillary Clinton isn’t the only politician who should heed our leadership on transparency and accountability. Donald Trump should also err on the side of disclosure. In that regard, Micah Morrison, our chief investigative reporter, has put that idea to paper in The Wall Street Journal. Micah covered the Clinton scandals for the Journal editorial page from 1994 to 2002 and is co-editor of the six-volume series, “Whitewater: A Journal Briefing.”
Here are excerpts from his article.
A generation ago, as the 1992 presidential campaign heated up, The Wall Street Journal asked: “Who Is Bill Clinton?” The country “will get to know, or try to get to know, Bill Clinton and Hillary,” the Journal noted. “The Gennifer Flowers tank has already rumbled by. But where’s the rest of them?”
Not far behind, as it turned out. Eight years of scandal and suspicion followed: Whitewater, Travelgate, the firing of all U.S. attorneys, the death of a White House deputy counsel and the jailing of a Justice Department associate attorney general, vanishing documents, congressional hearings, independent counsels, lurid allegations from Arkansas, 1996 campaign-finance misdeeds, Paula Jones, Monica, impeachment, the Marc Rich pardon.
Today, with his campaign staggering but the presidency perhaps still within his grasp, Donald Trump should consider the central lesson of the Clinton years: Scandal compounded by secrecy blots out the political sun. Opposition to the Clintons quickly coalesced as the media, members of Congress and outside groups seized the moment.
…
Mr. Trump promises it won’t be business as usual if he is elected president. But the same scandal-industrial complex that hemmed in his predecessors will quickly engulf him unless he makes some bold moves.
The most transformative solution would be to embrace radical transparency. Mr. Trump should immediately release his tax returns. He should direct the FBI and CIA to release any files it has on him. He should instruct his lawyers to stop acting like a defense team and embrace freedom-of-information practices. And he should appoint a transparency czar to ensure that his campaign and a future Trump administration will operate in an open and accountable manner. That would be a real revolution in Washington.
A truly transparent, accountable administration-in-waiting would not be just good policy, it would also be good politics. A massive document dump late in the campaign would electrify the media and shift the onus to Mrs. Clinton. The contrast with the secretiveness of the Clinton campaign and the lack of transparency in the Obama administration would be stark.
Judicial Watch won’t tell you (and can’t tell you) who to vote for, but we can tell politicians of both parties that they should respect the American people and end the practice of the modified limited hang out of potentially harmful information. Trust in politics is a two-way street. If they want the trust of Americans, they should first trust voters to evaluate fairly key background information.
Until next week…
Tom Fitton
President
The reaction of the political mealy-mouths providing post-debate “analysis” over whether Donald Trump might question the legitimacy of the election tells us all we need to know. Combine that with Barack Obama’s reaction – he said Trump’s claim is “not based on facts” — this week to Trump’s claims that the election is rigged and we learn without a doubt that: Yes, Virginia, the election is rigged.
U.S. elections, like the U.S. dollar, are confidence games. When people lose confidence in the system, the system will collapse. The system only has legitimacy as long as the people believe it has legitimacy – whether it does or not – and they participate in the process. If people lost confidence and ceased participation, the scam would collapse. So the farce must be maintained. That’s why the propaganda media and establishment politicians have gone so apoplectic over Trump’s comments. (Hint: That is why I tell you to stop voting for Tweedledumb R-Anywhere and Tweedledumber D-Somewhere else.)
So it is pounded into our heads from our youth how great it is that we live in an American “democracy” and have the system of “one person, one vote” and “everyone should vote” and “think of the people who died to ‘give you’ the right to vote” and “we can vote the rascals out.” And it’s all nonsense.
For starters, the notion of nationwide elections in a country as large as the U.S. is absurd on its face. Consider that one person — based only on his or her ability to 1) con people into believing that he thinks like they do and has their best interests at heart and, 2) persuade corporations and millions of people to fork over their money in exchange for benefits real or imagined – will be appointed to make decisions affecting 324 million Americans and 7.3 billion people around the world. Never mind that the only thing that person has in common with 99 percent of the voting public is the fact that they are breathing. And that one person this cycle turns out to be – if you believe the establishmentarians and their polls – Hillary Clinton.
Yes, the same Hillary Clinton whose policies were rejected eight years ago by Democrat voters and Republican establishmentarians is now the candidate for both Democrat voters and Republican establishmentarians. That same Witch from Chappaqua who is in poor health, is widely derided and reviled, is corrupt to the core, has no significant accomplishments under her Mao suit and who just dodged a federal indictment over the email/classified info scandal, is the chosen candidate of both the political class and the propaganda media – in order to maintain the status quo.
Obama tells us there’s “no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig elections.” Oh really, let us count the ways:
U.S. elections have been “rigged” many times, including in 1876, when Rutherford B. Hayes and his cronies stole the election from Samuel Tilden, earning for himself the moniker Rutherfraud Hayes; and in 1960 when John F. Kennedy stole the election from Richard Nixon.
In 2000, Al Gore challenged the results of the Florida vote which would decide whether he or George W. Bush would assume the presidency. Gore claimed, “blacks were discouraged from voting,” and the ballots were unfair. Speaking on the 2000 election at a private fund raiser in 2002, Hillary Clinton told the crowd that Bush had been “selected” rather than elected. That’s the very definition of a “rigged” election. At a Clinton campaign event last week, Gore repeated that he had won the 2000 election and Clinton smiled and nodded in agreement.
According to The New Yorker, “In 2004, when Kerry lost the Presidential race to George W. Bush, who is widely considered the worst President of the modern era, he refused to challenge the results, despite his suspicion that in certain states, particularly Ohio, where the Electoral College count hinged, proxies for Bush had rigged many voting machines.”
And in a conversation Kerry had with failed Afghan presidential aspirant Abdullah Abdullah, The New Yorker tells us:
After flattering Abdullah for his strength and importance in the country, Kerry said, “I will share with you a very personal experience: When I ran for President of the United States, in 2004, against George Bush, in the end, on Election Day, we had problems in the state of Ohio on how the votes were taking place. I even went to court in America to keep polling places open to make sure my people could vote. I knew that even in my country, the United States, where we had hundreds of years of practicing democracy, we still had problems carrying out that election.
In 2008, as WikiLeaks revealed, John McCain’s campaign had substantial evidence that Democrats and/or the Obama campaign had committed voter fraud, had paid Jesse Jackson hush money and that Obama had received an illegal campaign donation from Russia but McCain sat on the information so as not provoke a “race riot.”
So it’s not just Trump who has called into the question the legitimacy of an election. It’s also Tindel, Nixon, Gore, Clinton, McCain and Kerry.
As Thomas Woods writes:
Is the system rigged in the crude sense of counting the votes inaccurately? Probably not. In 2008 I stood outside a polling place in Alabama, where Ron Paul went on to receive five percent of the vote. And I’ll tell you: no more than five percent of the people I saw were Ron Paul voters. So those numbers were all too real.
But of course at a deeper level the system obviously is rigged. Our government-subsidized university system teaches complete b.s. to millions of kids — juvenile economics, bogus history, and postmodernist lunacy.
The media is a complete joke, as more and more revelations make clear, and totally in the tank for Hillary and the establishment.
The result of all this is supposed to be an informed citizenry? Who can say that with a straight face?
As Pat Buchanan points out, the rot goes a lot deeper. We have a Supreme Court exercising power no state ratifying convention told the people it would have, and pushes forward the progressive agenda (I hate that stupid word), and we’re supposed to sit back and accept it. Why, anything else would be treason against our sacred traditions!
A huge quota industry permeates all American institutions even though the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly insisted that no such thing was envisioned by that law. We are supposed to accept this, too.
The Democrats actually incited violence at the opposing party’s rallies.
Parties other than the Democrats and Republicans can’t even get a hearing. So our rigged system makes sure kids never learn of alternatives to the status quo while they’re in school, and then makes sure they never learn about them as adults.
You’re darn right it’s rigged.
The idea that millions of people might look upon a President Hillary Clinton as somehow illegitimate fills our media and intellectual classes with horror. Well, good. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving group.
As a Rothbardian libertarian, I think all these sociopaths are illegitimate. The problem isn’t that too many people might come to think so, but that too few will.
We don’t need a paternal custodian to create jobs, fund science, educate our kids, or kill foreigners for no good reason. Civil society does a vastly better job at the first three of those things — and it leaves foreigners alone.
Perceived “legitimacy” is the biggest weapon the state holds. Undermining it should be cheered, not deplored.
News Release
Homer CCSD 33C
Goodings Grove Luther J. Schilling William E. Young William J. Butler
Hadley Middle Homer Jr. High
Contact: Charla Brautigam, Communications/Public Relations Manager
cbrautigam@homerschools.org | 708-226-7628
For Immediate Release:
Oct. 20, 2016
Fourth-graders learn how to build, program and test robots
After-school enrichment program underway at all four elementary schools
Fourth-graders throughout Homer School District 33C are learning how to build, program and test robots during an after-school enrichment program.
Taught by Homer 33C teachers, the STEAM AHEAD WITH EXPLORERS program challenges students to delve further into science, technology, engineering, art and math.
Dozens of students from Butler, Goodings Grove, Young and Schilling schools have signed up to participate in the workshop series.
They will be working in teams of four to five students, learning how to build, program and test robots using LEGO MINDSTORM EV3 kits.
The workshop is sponsored by Homer 33C, University of Illinois-Will County Extension and 4-H Club.
Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/homer33c?fref=ts&ref=br_tf
News Release
Homer CCSD 33C
Goodings Grove Luther J. Schilling William E. Young William J. Butler
Hadley Middle Homer Jr. High
Contact: Charla Brautigam, Communications/Public Relations Manager
cbrautigam@homerschools.org | 708-226-7628
For Immediate Release:
Oct. 19, 2016
Homer Junior High students take stand against bullying
Participate in Unity Walk
Homer Junior High School students stand united against bullying.
On Oct. 19, in conjunction with Unity Day, students participated in a Unity Walk on the school track during their advisory classes.
Many wore orange (the official color of National Bullying Prevention Month) and carried signs with such slogans as “Bullying. Be Smart. Don’t Start” and “Bullies Tear Down. Friends Build Up.”
“We hope that by taking time to reflect on what it means to be united as a school during our Unity Walk, students will understand what it means to be a caring, kind, respectful and empathetic individual,” said Homer Junior High Assistant Principal Greg Zurales.
Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/homer33c?fref=ts&ref=br_tf