Home Blog Page 577

Obama don't care about the cost to maybe use cleaner energy

Ten stories to understand Mississippi’s Kemper Project “clean coal” boondoggle

By

Thursday, July 7th, 2016

Kemper_County_Coal_Gasification_Plant

Mississippi’s Kemper Project entered the world with the highest hopes of the Obama Administration: that coal could be cleanly processed even while serving as a power source. The first-of-its-kind integrated-gasification power plant functions by converting lignite coal to natural gas-like synthesis gas, which fire its 582-megawatt turbines, capturing and storing carbon much better than traditional coal-fired plants.
A recent investigation from the New York Times has drawn national attention to the travails of Kemper, finding that the plant has been plagued by technical problems, cost-overruns and blame-shifting. The Times’ findings that Kemper has failed to live up to its billing, however, should come as no surprise to readers of Mississippi Watchdog, which has been covering the plant’s travails every step of the way for more than two years running.
Here are the ten Mississippi Watchdog stories you need to read to understand the history of this “clean coal” boondoggle:
7/28/14 – $5.53 billion Kemper Project’s genesis a tangled path
Red flags surrounding Mississippi Power’s Kemper Project started to become painfully apparent in the summer of 2014, when delays in the plant’s construction began stretching so long that it cost the Southern Company $133 million in federal investment tax credits. At this point the plant’s estimated cost had risen from $2.2 billion when it was initially proposed in 2009 to $5.53 billion. To help pick up the tab for rising costs, local ratepayers were slammed with an 18 percent increase on their utility bills.

 
11/5/14 – Report on Kemper Project casts embattled power plant in poor light
Concerns over the plant’s viability became more founded a few months later when Mississippi Watchdog covered a report on Kemper from POWER Burns & Roe — an engineering firm that specializes in building utility projects. At this point the cost of the plant had risen to more than $6 billion. The report highlighted three problem areas with the coal-gasification plant that were largely to blame for the delays and cost increases:

  • Safety issues caught late in the project and fixed at great cost
  • Major delays in acknowledging cost increases and delays in plant startup when the causes for those delays were apparent early in the process
  • Poor project management

3/20/15 – Nation’s oldest integrated coal gasification plant might point to more Kemper trouble
As a point of reference to the travails of the Kemper Project, which seeks to harness a relatively new technology, consider the experience of the nation’s oldest integrated coal gasification power plant: Tampa Electric’s Polk Power Station. Like Mississippi Power’s Kemper Project, this older and simpler plant uses a gasifier to turn coal into synthesis gas, and it, too, was beset by problems. A report by the Department of Energy in 2002, four years after the plant went online, found a raft of technical problems that eerily foreshadowed the difficulties the Kemper Project was to face.
7/24/15 – Kemper Project makes for an expensive natural gas plant
By July of 2015, the cost of the Kemper Project had ballooned to $6.229 billion and implementation of its gasification technology had dragged two years behind schedule. Instead of using the gasifier to transform the abundant lignite coal mined nearby into synthesis gas, as Kemper was designed, Mississippi Power began using natural gas to fuel the turbines of the combined cycle plant. Yet even as a natural gas plant, Mississippi Watchdog pointed out, the plant was still about $300 million more expensive to build than an equivalent conventional combined cycle natural gas plant powered by the same fuel.
9/10/15 – Kemper no longer considered just a clean coal plant
Once the Kemper Project started operating with natural gas, Mississippi Power began labeling it a “dual fuel” power plant capable of generating electricity from natural gas or synthesis gas made from lignite coal by the gasifier. This represented a major shift in the company’s tone from earlier documents authorizing construction that insisted the Kemper Project was intended to run on lignite coal as an environmentally friendly way of achieving “fuel diversity.” Mississippi Power CEO Ed Holland tried to spin this as a positive development, saying “the opportunity is there because gas prices are much lower than anyone predicted at the time the Kemper Plant was built.”
10/1/15 – Mississippi PSC commissioner accused of accepting illegal contributions
The image problems at Kemper went from bad to worse last fall when Mississippi Watchdog reported that Mississippi Public Service Central District commissioner Lynn Posey was accused of illegally receiving campaign funds from contractors on the Kemper Project. It is unlawful under Section 77-1-11 (1) of the Mississippi Code for a PSC commissioner to accept any gift, pass, money or campaign contribution from any person or entity of a utility under the regulatory authority for the PSC. The violations allegedly took place two years earlier at a pair of simultaneous fundraising dinners at Tico’s Steakhouse in Jackson and Weidmann’s in Meridian.
10/26/15 – Expert: More delays likely for Kemper Project
If there are any common threads running through the Kemper saga, they can be summed up in two words: overruns and delays. That was the conclusion, at least, of Don Grace, an accountant and subcontractor working for the Public Utilities Staff who told the Mississippi Public Commission last October that Mississippi Power invested in only “minimal design” to determine its original cost estimates and operating schedule. The result was cost overruns and construction delays that Grace predicted would delay Kemper’s startup date in the second quarter of 2016, potentially leading to rate hikes and the loss of more federal tax breaks.
For those keeping score at home, at this point the cost of Kemper had risen to $6.267 billion, and the plant was still two years behind schedule.
2/16/16 – Former manager: Southern Company lied about Kemper schedule
Yet another bombshell fell on the scandal- and schedule-plagued power plant in February when a former project manager at the then-$6.36 billion plant ended his company-ordered silence. Brett Wingo, who previously worked as an engineer for Southern Company Services, told Mississippi Watchdog that the company lied to regulators about the Kemper Project’s construction schedule in an effort to hang onto more than $234 million in federal tax credits. Wingo said he went all the way up the company’s chain of command in 2014 after he started to suspect impending delays two years earlier, but his pleas were ignored at every turn. Wingo was placed on administrative leave in August 2014.
3/3/16 – Lawsuit alleges fraud over ‘goliath’ Kemper Project power plant
The Kemper Project has yet to generate any power from its integrated coal gasification technology, but it has generated one thing in bunches: lawsuits. The latest was filed in March by three plaintiffs — a Biloxi seafood processing firm, Island View Casino and a Gulfport resident — claiming Mississippi Power Co. damaged its roughly 186,000 ratepayers by avoiding accountability for “fraud and mismanagement while fleecing the public in the interest of profits” in building the “goliath” Kemper Project power plant. The suit takes a different legal route than some of the previous lawsuits filed against Mississippi Power in that it does not seek to change the utility’s rates. Instead it isseeking economic losses, punitive damages, attorney fees and court costs.
At this point, the cost of the plant had ballooned further still – to $6.644 billion.
3/25/16 – Monitor: Kemper Project might not make its start date
Several months into 2016, Mississippi Power has yet to get its act together concerning the Kemper Project. According to a report in March from AECOM, an engineering firm that independently monitors and supervises the construction of the Kemper Project, the facility might not make its scheduled start date in the third quarter of this year. Randall Hodges, who leads the monitoring team, said that progress “will have to improve to meet the reported operational date of third quarter of this year.” He added that if Mississippi Power continues its startup progress of about 1 percent per month so far this year, it will take another 13 months to finish, pushing the in-service date into 2017.
Any delays beyond the end of August – the company’s projected commercial operation date – could cost the company up to $30 million per month.
See all of the articles on Watchdog.org

Is Illinois Exporting Corruption Into Missouri?

0

Is Illinois Exporting Corruption Into Missouri?

Across America, taxpayers are concerned about politicians rigging the system. In many cases this looks like a “friends and family plan” in which the close associates of politicians get special favors and perks. A prime example is the campaign fund of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. During the 2015 mayor’s race, our team at OpenTheBooks.com found 600 Emanuel donors who contributed $7 million in campaign cash (2011-2014) while their affiliated companies received $2 billion in city payments (since 2002).
Emanuel was hardly the first Illinois politician to engage in “pay to play” politics. In 2008, the Chicago Tribune found that 235 individuals made donations of exactly $25,000 to then-Governor Rod Blagojevich’s campaign and discovered that “3 of 4 donations came from companies or interest groups who got something.”
If Missouri Sen. Kurt Schaefer’s (R-Columbia) campaign for Attorney General is any guide, it looks like the “Show Me” state may be following in Illinois’ footsteps.
Our investigators at OpenTheBooks.com have discovered that, since 2008, Schaefer raised $720,000 in campaign cash from 271 individual donors and their affiliated companies that also received $3.1 billion in state payments.
Read More http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamandrzejewski/2016/07/06/is-illinois-exporting-corruption-into-missouri/#72a020ef6162
 

Illinoisans should be angry enough to drive a stake in the heart of the political establishment

Pat-Hughes-headshot-2014-WEB

An Honest Moment in Springfield

By Pat Hughes
 
Illinois Democrats have proven once again that serving you is not their first priority. They are more interested in working the system to serve themselves.
 
Before adjourning for the Independence Day holiday, with $8 billion in unpaid bills to the state’s social services providers and businesses, State Senator Kimberly Lightford (D-Chicago) stood on the floor of the Illinois Senate and declared, “We’re not vendors… we deserve to get paid.” We’re not them. We’re legislators.
 
Lightford
 
Politicians are rarely so honest about their core beliefs. They typically let their actions do the talking. For example:
 

  • Last month Chicago homeowners saw a 13% increase on property tax bills, while buildingsrepresented by House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) and Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) got sweetheart property tax deals.
  • In May, as parents wondered about the future of their children’s schools, State Representatives Mike Smiddy (D-Port Byron) and Kate Cloonen (D-Kankakee) obliviously played Candy Crush on House Floor during debate over a critical education bill.
  • At the end of legislative session, Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie (D-Chicago) flippantly repeated a one word response to serious questions about spending proposals in a budget that would have required a 47% tax increase on families and businesses.

 
In this case, however, Lightford succinctly summed up the central principle of Illinois’ ruling class:Insiders count. People who play by the rules… don’t.
 
Still, we wonder how she could make such a grossly oblivious statement. The reason is partly that members of Illinois’ political class feel their influence, status, and privilege means they aren’t responsible for the real-world consequences of their own rhetoric. It is also that they have simply forgotten what life is like for Illinoisans, or never really knew it at all.
 
The reason elites, like Kimberly Lightford, give the impression that they have never had to make a choice between laying off employees and losing their business is because they are part of a rigged political system with no bottom-line sensitivity. That is why Illinois legislators receive the 5th highest paychecks in the nation, while we have $8 billion in unpaid bills.
 
It is similarly difficult to imagine that Barbara Flynn Currie or House Speaker Mike Madigan have ever had to wait in an emergency room line with a sick child or care for a loved one with disabilities. Their legislative choices demonstrate over and over again that they are laser focused on preserving their own power. The sustainability of social services or strength and credibility of our Medicaid program are merely political talking points at election time. For that, we are ranked 47th out of the 50 states in providing services for people with developmental disabilities despite record high taxes.
 
And Kate Cloonen and Mike Smiddy certainly don’t give us the idea that they know what it is like for a parent to be subject to the ambiguity of a lottery in order to provide their child a decent education. Someone who has lived through that is highly unlikely to play a video game as their party bosses attempt to hold schools hostage in order to pass an out of balance budget and demand a bailout for underperforming Chicago Public Schools.
 
Illinois Democrats are well known for the sources and systems through which they engineer wealth, power, and influence. They make a tremendous show of embracing select and politically convenient values in order to exercise and perpetuate their privilege and power. And, as Kimberly Lightford demonstrated, they are outraged when anyone dares suggest – by word or by vote – that they are mediocrities.
 
Little wonder the underlying theme of the 2016 election has been anger and disgust directed toward the political establishment. Per the polls, an overwhelming majority of Illinoisans see their families’ future and the state’s outlook as extremely bleak. And they see the political leaders in Springfield as being megalomaniacal, avaricious, narcissistic or feckless.
 
As we head into general election season, the question is: are Illinoisans truly angry enough to finally drive a stake through the heart of the political establishment that has used and ignored them for decades, or is that merely something they tell the pollsters?
 
Kimberly Lightford just told you who they are. On November 8, tell them who you are.

Colorado may Double State Tax to provide Universal Health Care

Single-payer hitting close to home

Amendment 69 would create a health care payment system that would partly finance health care for Colorado residents through a $25 billion increase in state taxes. Photo: Getty Images
Amendment 69 would create a health care payment system that would partly finance health care for Colorado residents through a $25 billion increase in state taxes. Photo: Getty Images

I’ve attended several recent industry conferences here in Colorado. And as you might expect if you’ve been following the news, one topic dominated the conversation:universal health care.
The November ballot in the Centennial state will include an initiated constitutional amendment known as Amendment 69, which, if passed, will create a health care payment system that would partly finance health care for Colorado residents through a $25 billion increase in state taxes.

According to the ColoradoCare website, the program would “cover all residents and cost less than the current system.” Some of the projected benefits listed on the site include ambulatory patient series, hospitalization, prescription drugs, mental health services, emergency and urgent care, and preventive and wellness services.
stock-photo-pregnant-woman-belly-with-debt-stamp-240106738
The site features a quote from Bernie Sanders, stating that Colorado “could lead the nation in moving toward a system to ensure better health care for more people at less cost. In the richest nation on earth, we should make health care a right for all citizens.”
Of course, not everyone views the amendment in such a positive light.
At the Colorado State Association of Health Underwriters Symposium last month in Denver, Colorado State Treasurer Walker Stapleton said the amendment’s goal is to make Colorado the “test tube for single-payer health across the United States,” and added that the only requirement to qualify for health care would be a driver’s license. “Imagine the number of people with chronic conditions who will be moving to Colorado as a result of this initiative.”
He also cited an estimated cost of $25 billion in year one alone, which “would effectively double Colorado’s budget.” He said business groups around the state keep telling him, “You’ve got to be kidding me, there’s no way this thing is going to pass.” His response? “Never underestimate the power of what people perceive to be free on the ballot.”
Surveys indicate opponents have reason to worry. Polling of Colorado voters showsstrong support for the Amendment, and a recent report from the Denver Business Journal noted that even when pollsters were presented with the opponents’ point of view, “approval still remained at 51 percent, as opposed to 43 percent disapproval.”
At the CIAB Leadership Forum in Colorado Springs, retired neurosurgeon and former 2016 Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson offered another criticism.
“Single payer would be awful,” he said, because it would “remove the element of competition. It would remove the excellence.” If the U.S. moved to such a system, he said, the forces that helped create centers of excellence like Johns Hopkins and Mass General would disappear. More importantly, he said, “it’s not the American way.”
Come November, we’ll see if Coloradans agree, via another staple of the American way: the polling booth. In the long run, their decision could have far-reaching implications.

ILLINOIS AMONG TOP 10 LOCATIONS FOR TAKING IN SYRIAN REFUGEES

TUESDAY, JULY 05, 2016    Illinois Review

More Turncoat Republicans Side With Radical Gun Control!

Editors note:  The Republicans told us they needed the senate to stop horrible unconstitutional  detrimental Obama dictates and interpretation of laws. We got both houses yet nothing was done. Democrats only have the Whith House yet seem to get whatever they want. Think of the omnibus Bill shoved through by our new Speaker Paul Ryan. Lets be honest, the Republicans are spineless. They say never Trump so their establishment graff and perks can continue with Clinton, the most corrupt liar in modern politics who is responsible for numerous deaths and loss of classified information. Think about the Clinton Foundation getting millions from all over the world.
 

It’s official. The anti-gun, turncoat Republicans have announced they have enough votes to pass their gun control bill…

Conservative-Daily Newsletter

Even More Turncoat Republicans Side With Radical Gun Control!

 Fellow Conservative,
Late last week, Mitch McConnell held a test-vote on gun control. Before being embarrassed with another floor vote, he wanted to gauge support before moving forward.
The Senate could have killed the anti-gun Collins Amendment for good, but that’s not what happened. 52 Senators voted in favor of the amendment. This isn’t entirely accurate because notable anti-gun Senators Diane Feinstein and Bernie Sanders did not cast votes.
So the next time this bill comes to a vote, it will only need SIX Republicans to swap sides to pass it.
The amendment’s author, Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), has publicly declared that another 10 Republican Senators have told her that they intend to vote in favor of this gun control bill. That would give this amendment more than enough support to meet the 60-vote threshold for passage.
We’re not out of the woods yet. The Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations bill is still being voted on. It hasn’t passed yet.
As long as this stays remains on the agenda, then the Collins amendment remains the greatest threat to American gun owners and liberty lovers.
The horribly anti-gun Collins amendment is still alive and now has enough votes to pass! FaxBlast Congress and DEMAND they kill any and all unconstitutional gun control bills or amendments.
You already know the specifics. The Collins Amendment would give the FBI the power to block someone from purchasing or owning guns without even having to produce enough evidence to charge them with a crime.
Instead of forcing a prosecutor to prove a suspect to be “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,” this amendment would allow the suspension of constitutional rights without even forcing investigators to meet a “probable cause” standard.
Gone are the days of “innocent until proven guilty.”
A majority of US Senators officially voted to make American gun owners guilty until proven innocent.
It is a gross abuse of our Constitutional rights. This bill would gut both the 2nd and 5th Amendments.
Eight Republican Senators voted to give the government the power to arbitrarily suspend your Constitutional rights.  You can see how each Senator voted here.
They came up just a couple votes short. We have lived to see another day.
But that other day is today!
The Senate is moving through the bills on its agenda to pass as many pieces of legislation as possible before going home to celebrate the 4th of July holiday.
If we’re going to save the Bill of Rights, we need to do it now!
Don’t let Congress sneak this horrible gun control amendment through! Send your FaxBlast and FORCE Congress to kill the Collins Amendment and any other attempt to destroy the Bill of Rights!
Sincerely,
Joe Otto
Conservative Daily

The Militarization of America

By Adam Andrzejewski, CEO of OpenTheBooks 7/6/2016
7782e8f9-06f0-42ed-97f5-ad16b3db321c-original
Today, the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, held hearings on the security of the gun and ammunition lockers at Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Prison System (FPS), and Bureau of Land Management (BLM).
Congressman Mark Meadows (R-NC) grills the administrators on their weaponry and coding mistakes:
  • 1.7 billion bullets procured by DHS
  • Women’s hygiene products mis-coded as body armor at FPS
  • Cable TV described as ‘Cable Dude’ and coded by DHS as guns
  • 4,700 bayonets flowing to DHS from military surplus – why?
    And more… watch the hearing, click here.

Today, Adam Andrzejewski, CEO of OpenTheBooks, is published in the Washington Times with an editorial, “Firepower for the Feds?”
Illustration on federal agencies weapons purchases by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times

Illustration on federal agencies weapons purchases by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times
Here’s a quick summary of Andrzejewski’s important column:
* Our honorary chairman, former Sen. Tom Coburn, issued a clarion call for an assault weapons ban at the federal administrative agencies.
* Who is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) preparing to battle after procurement orders for 1.7 billion bullets and 452 million hollow-point rounds?
* Why isn’t the U.S. border secure? Since 1993, the number of border and immigration officers tripled from 20,000 to 60,000, as undocumented entrants also tripled.

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform | Washington D.C.
Hearing: ‘Firearms and Munitions at Risk: Examining Inadequate Safeguards’
Full Report

Shocking Polls Show What U.S. Muslims Think of U.S. Laws

Shocking Polls Show What U.S. Muslims Think of U.S. Laws

2016-07-05 | Andrew G. Bostom, PJ Media

As July 4 approaches, new polling data reveal non-Muslim Americans are increasingly cognizant of the threat Sharia — Islam’s totalitarian religio-political “law” — poses to their basic liberties. Overwhelmingly, they reject its encroachment in the United States.
But polling data also reveal that an ominous, growing proportion of American Muslims wish to impose Sharia on America.
Opinion Savvy polled a random sample of 803 registered voters — 98.2% non-Muslim, and 1.8% Muslim (with age, race, gender, political affiliation, and region propensity score-weighted to reduce biases) — from June 19 to June 20, 2016. They asked:
Do you believe that the United States government should screen, or actively identify individuals entering the United States who support Sharia law?
Seventy-one percent affirmed:
Yes, supporters of Sharia should be identified before they are admitted into the US.
The group answering “yes” was then asked:
Once identified, do you believe that individuals who support the practice of Sharia law should be admitted into the United States?
Eighty percent responded:
No, supporters of Sharia should not be admitted into the US.
The next query, which addressed only foreign visitors, elicited an even more emphatic demand for fidelity to bedrock First Amendment principles. It asked:
Do you believe that the United States government should require all foreign individuals entering the United States to affirm that they will uphold the principles of the constitution, such as freedom of religion and speech, above all personal ideologies for the duration of their stay in the country?
Seventy-eight percent insisted:
Yes, visitors to the US should be required to agree to uphold the constitution, regardless of their personal ideology, as a condition of their visit.
The unblinkered assessment of Sharia validates its broadly shared rejection by non-Muslim Americans, but also illustrates how increased U.S. Muslim Sharia support represents a dangerous trend.
Time Is Running Out for American Muslims
The Sharia, Islam’s canon law, is traceable to Koranic verses and edicts (45:18, 42:13, 42:21, 5:48; 4:34, 5:33-34, 5:38, 8:12-14; 9:5, 9:29, 24:2-4), as further elaborated in the “hadith” — the traditions of Islam’s prophet Muhammad and the earliest Muslim community — and codified into formal “legal” rulings by Islam’s greatest classical legists. Sharia is a retrogressive development compared with the evolution of clear distinctions between “ritual, the law, moral doctrine, good customs in society, etc.,” within Western European Christendom.
Sharia is utterly incompatible with the conceptions of human rights enshrined in the U.S. Bill of Rights.
Here are some liberty-crushing, dehumanizing Sharia sanctions: open-ended jihadism to subjugate the world to a totalitarian Islamic order; rejection of bedrock Western liberties — including freedom of conscience and speech — enforced by imprisonment, beating, or death; discriminatory relegation of non-Muslims to outcast, vulnerable pariahs, and even Muslim women to subservient chattel; and barbaric punishments which violate human dignity such as amputation for theft, stoning to death for adultery, and lashing for alcohol consumption.
Compounding these fundamental freedom- and dignity-abrogating iniquities, “matters of procedure” under Islamic law are antithetical to Western conceptions of the rule of law. “Evidentiary proof” is non-existent by Western legal standards, and the Shariadoctrine of siyasa (“government” or “administration”) grants wide latitude to the ruling elites — rendering permissible arbitrary threats, beatings, and imprisonments of defendants to extract “confessions,” particularly from “dubious” suspects. Clearly, Sharia “standards” are intellectually and morally inferior to the antithetical concepts which underpin Western law.
From October 22 to October 26, 2012, Wenzel Strategies polled 600 U.S. Muslims of high socio-economic status. They were asked:

Do you believe that criticism of Islam or Muhammad should be permitted under the Constitution’s First Amendment?

 
Regarding this most fundamental U.S. right, 58% replied “no.” Only 42% affirmed this most basic manifestation of freedom of speech, i.e., to criticize religious or any other dogma.
Indeed, oblivious to U.S. constitutional law as opposed to Islam’s Sharia, a largely concordant 45% of respondents agreed with the following:
 

[T]hose who criticize or parody Islam in the U.S. should face criminal charges.

 
Only 38% did not; 17% were “unsure.”
Moreover, fully 12% of this Muslim sample even admitted they believed in application of the draconian, Sharia-based punishment for the non-existent crime of “blasphemy” in the U.S. code, answering affirmatively that:
 

Americans who criticize or parody Islam should be put to death.

 
In June of 2015, data from a survey of another 600 U.S. Muslims conducted by the respected political pollster Kellyanne Conway revealed:
 

51% … agreed that Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to Sharia.

 
 Perhaps most frightening, 25% of those polled agreed:
 

[V]iolence against Americans here in the United States is justified as a part of the global jihad.

 
Why is Sharia supremacism — which is diametrically opposed to U.S. Constitutional law — so alarmingly prevalent among U.S. Muslims? The inescapable conclusion, validated in Senate Judiciary Committee testimony this week by Department of Homeland Security whistleblower Philip Haney, is that mainstream institutional Islam within the U.S. inculcates this liberty-crushing mentality.
Haney’s presentation mentioned in passing the mainstream Assembly of Muslim Jurists of America, (AMJA). Well-accepted by thebroader American Muslim community, the Islamic scholars affiliated with AMJA have attained influential positions in universities, Islamic centers, and mosques throughout the United States. AMJA scholars train American imams. They issue online “fatwas” — Islamic Sharia rulings — to guide individual Muslims. Should the mainstream AMJA accomplish its unabashed goal of implementing Sharia in North America, the organization has already issued a ruling which sanctions the killing of non-Muslim “blasphemers.”
Donald Trump’s rational call for a moratorium on Muslim immigration, especially from hotbeds of violent Sharia supremacism, must be viewed gimlet-eyed bearing in mind irrefragable data capturing U.S. (here, here) and global Muslim attitudes, as well as the behavior of mainstream, institutional American Islam.
Forty years ago, Husayn al-Quwatli — director general of Dar al-Ifta, the center of spiritual authority for the Sunni community of Lebanon, and author of the treatise Islam, the State, and Secularism (1975) — candidly elucidated the Muslim Sharia supremacist mindset which perhaps best validates Trump’s moratorium:
 

The position of Islam is very clear on one point, namely that the true Muslim cannot take a disinterested position vis-à-vis the state. As a result, his position with regard to ruler and rule cannot be an indecisive one which is content with half solutions. 
Either the ruler is Muslim and the rule Islamic, then he will be content with the state and support it, or the ruler non-Muslim and the rule non-Islamic, then he rejects it, opposes it, and works to abolish it, gently or forcibly, openly or secretly.

Action Alert/ House GOP to Promote Muslim Brotherhood, Gun Control Agenda this Week

From: DCattoni@aol.com
To: dcattoni@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 1:50:20 PM
Subject: ALERT!  Please Call your Representatives on ‘anti-terror’ package & Kate’s law

House GOP to Promote Muslim Brotherhood, Gun Control Agenda this Week
In case you thought congressional Republicans would be infused with a fresh sense of constitutionalism, patriotism, and moral clarity on the heels of this Independence Day weekend, think again. House Republicans will continue their dyslexic response to Orlando by validating the Left’s entire premise regarding homeland security and guns.
Last week, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas (A, 97%) conducted a hearing which revealed that the Department of Homeland Security, at the behest of Muslim Brotherhood organizations, is deleting critical counter-terrorism research that would have connected many Muslim Brotherhood leaders to global Islamic terror networks and could have prevented some of the recent attacks. When Cruz asked Jeh Johnson, Secretary of Homeland Security, about this at a subsequent hearing, the lead homeland security officer vehemently denied having any knowledge of the cover-up and adamantly declined to investigate it.
A sane Republican Party would immediately pursue this issue, and the failure to do so belies our failed homeland security policy. Instead, Republicans plan to pass an “anti-terror package,” which actually validates the very Muslim Brotherhood agenda endangering our homeland. The House will vote on H.R. 5611, which would grow the fledgling department even more by creating the Office for Partnerships to Prevent Terrorism to engage the Muslim community in pursuit of counter-terrorism strategies. This bill mirrors Rep. Michael McCaul’s R, Texas (D, 60%) “Countering Violent Extremism” bill which passed the House Committee on Homeland Security last year and appoints a new assistant secretary that will be unaccountable to Congress. The bill tasks the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties office of DHS, which serves as ground zero for Muslim Brotherhood influence on this administration, with dispensing the grant funds. The legislation also uses inaccurate liberal talking points with regards to the nature of the Islamic threat and lone wolf attacks. VOTE NO ON HR 5611 https://www.conservativereview.com/scorecard

Wouldn’t it be prudent to have both houses of Congress focus on the same messaging this week and put the Democrats on defense?
After taking incoming fire from conservatives for echoing and legitimizing the Muslim Brotherhood agenda, this new bill scrubs all references to “violent” extremism and indeed uses the term Islamic extremism.  This is a complete dog and pony show. The problem with the existing policies of DHS are not limited to the nomenclature. House leaders could use the term “Islamic” to appease conservatives, but, absent a wholesale makeover of the department’s personnel and a complete ban on Muslim Brotherhood participation, the new funds and offices will be used to expand the existing dangerous policies. It’s akin to throwing more money and resources at a fire department that has already been infiltrated by arsonists.

If Republicans were serious about fixing the problem, they would bar any grant funds from going to groups implicated in the Holy Land Foundation trial. They could mandate reforms to the counter-terrorism training for federal law enforcement officers in light of Phil Haney’s expose showing how the DHS and FBI scrubbed all fact-based training in Islamic history and Islamic law for the purpose of formulating threat assessments.
Immediately following the Orlando attack, I listed eight ways Republicans can go on offense. Sadly, they’ve chosen to go on offense for Democrats. In addition to expanding DHS offices that Obama will stock with Muslim Brotherhood sympathizers, the bill contains a provision expanding the power of the Attorney General to deny gun purchases to those listed on random terror watch lists. Although this provision is not nearly as sweeping as the Democratic proposal, the entire premise of focusing on this non-sequitur is offensive. It’s preposterous to focus on lists that never net potential terrorists while there are known individuals or groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood who are given security clearances in our homeland security agencies. Also, the minute Republicans pass this bill, the Obama administration could expand the watch list to include anyone, perhaps even political enemies.
WHY WOULD THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS PASS A DEMOCRAT BILL?  VOTE NO TO HR5611
The sad irony is that the Senate will actually focus on something worthy this week – going after sanctuary cities and instituting mandatory minimum sentences for illegal aliens who re-enter the country after being deported. The latter bill is Ted Cruz’s “Kate’s Law,” addressing the many criminal aliens that continue to re-enter the country, including the one who killed Kate Steinle in San Francisco last year. Wouldn’t it be prudent to have both houses of Congress focus on the same messaging this week and put the Democrats on defense? Instead, House Republicans will allow Democrats to continue distracting the public with their gun control agenda. Alas, after the Senate undermined conservatives for the past two weeks, it must be too much to ask that both chambers actually stay on message for one week.

The most detested man in D.C. Dick Durbin, plans on voting NO to Kate’s law because he doesn’t agree with ‘the mandatory minimum of 5 years’.
CALL HIS OFFICE AT 202-224-2152. SB2193
Durbin admits he ORDERED the FBI to purge words deemed ‘offensive’ to Muslims from training manual!
“I asked for it, because there were provisions in the training manual which were…

Homer 33C establishes concussion guidelines

0

News Release
Homer CCSD 33C
Goodings Grove   Luther J. Schilling   William E. Young   William J. Butler
Hadley Middle   Homer Jr. High
 
Contact: Charla Brautigam, Communications/Public Relations Manager
cbrautigam@homerschools.org | 708-226-7628
 
 
 
For Immediate Release:
July 5, 2016
 
Homer 33C establishes concussion guidelines
 
If a child suffers a concussion at school or home, Homer School District 33C teachers and staff are ready to assist.
 
The district has created a policy and procedure manual outlining what to do if a child suffers a concussion. It includes:

  • Key terms associated with concussion and its management
  • Procedures for reporting a concussion and follow-up guidelines
  • Forms and information that can be duplicated and distributed to concerned parties
  • General features of good concussion management

 
“This document reflects Illinois state law requirements for schools to implement Return to Learn and Return to Play guidelines that are designed to support the student with a concussion and maximize full recovery and quality of life,” Kathleen Robinson, assistant superintendent for instruction, reported at the June 28 Board of Education meeting.
 
The document was developed by the district’s Concussion Oversight Team, comprised of Robinson, Athletic Director Amanda Monahan, Certified School Nurse Melissa Geibel and School Psychologist Gwent Grant.
 
The team was guided by research from Lurie Children’s Hospital and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which found 80 percent of children are ready to return to play one to four weeks after suffering a concussion.
 
Based on those findings, the team came up with a table and flowchart to help teachers, coaches and parents determine when it’s OK for students with concussions to return to their academic studies (Return to Learn) and athletic programs (Return to Play).
 
The Return to Learn table outlines six stages of recovery (such as no school/limited cognitive ability and gradual reintroduction of daily activities) and lists corresponding activities or restrictions that students should follow.
 
Before advancing from one stage to the next, students must be able to tolerate activities (free of headaches, nausea, dizziness and other symptoms associated with concussions) for 12 to 24 hours.
 
Only after students can tolerate all pre-injury academic activities and schedules will they be allowed to consider returning to athletic activities. The student’s physician will be responsible for monitoring the Return to Play Protocol and return to physical education activities.
 
To help guide the process, students, parents, teachers and coaches may follow the district’s Return to Play flowchart, which outlines steps each individual should take and the documentation needed from the family physician.
 
“Successful recovery from a concussion requires that the student is surrounded by family and professionals who communicate frequently, are knowledgeable about what to do in the early days, are calm and supportive, and assist the student in managing exertion and rest balance,” the team concluded in its report.
 
The Homer 33C Concussion Guidelines will be shared and discussed with coaches, teachers and staff during upcoming training sessions and posted on the district website, said Robinson.
 
Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/homer33c?fref=ts&ref=br_tf
 
 

RECENT POSTS